Retail trading, driven by individual investors buying and selling stocks, has a significant impact on market dynamics. Despite their smaller trading volumes, retail traders can influence stock prices and hence contibute to market anomalies. This article delves into the relationship between retail trading and momentum profitability, investigating whether stocks with higher levels of retail trading exhibit stronger momentum effects, offering valuable insights for both academics and practitioners.
Retail investors, often less sophisticated than institutional investors, exhibit behavioral biases that can lead to market anomalies—situations where stock prices deviate from their fundamental values. One such anomaly is momentum trading, a strategy that buys past winners and sells past losers. Historically, momentum strategies have generated significant excess returns, challenging the notion of market efficiency. Recent studies have shown that retail investors' contrarian behavior around news events contributes to these momentum profits.
We can come up with three three hypotheses regarding the relationship between retail trading and momentum profitability. These hypotheses are designed to uncover the underlying mechanisms through which retail investor behavior influences momentum trading outcomes:
The study utilizes data from the NYSE ReTrac database, covering retail trading from April 2005 to December 2015. Retail trading proportion (RTP) is calculated as the ratio of retail trading volume to total market trading volume. The formula for RTP is:
RTPi = Retail Trading Volumei / Total Market Trading Volumei
The momentum strategy involves sorting stocks based on their past returns and retail trading levels.
Stocks are sorted into quintiles based on RTP and past returns (Mom). Table 1 summarizes mean excess returns and alphas for the portfolios from April 2005 to December 2015. Results indicate a positive relationship between RTP and momentum profitability, with stocks in the highest RTP quintile exhibiting significantly higher momentum profits.
RTP Quintile | Mean Excess Return | CAPM Alpha | FF3 Alpha | C4 Alpha | FF5 Alpha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTP1 | 0.09% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
RTP2 | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.23% |
RTP3 | 0.67% | 0.65% | 0.63% | 0.61% | 0.59% |
RTP4 | 1.12% | 1.10% | 1.08% | 1.05% | 1.02% |
RTP5 | 1.51% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.39% |
Using Fama and MacBeth (1973) regressions, the study examines the cross-sectional relationship between retail trading and future momentum profits. The results confirm that momentum effects are stronger among stocks with higher retail trading levels. A one standard deviation increase in a stock's past cumulative return leads to a 0.446 percentage points increase in the next month's return.
The Fama-MacBeth regression model is specified as:
Ri,t+1 = α + β1Momi + β2RTPi + β3(Momi × RTPi) + εi,t+1
where Ri,t+1 is the return of stock i in month t+1, Momi is the past return, and RTPi is the retail trading proportion.
Retail investors often favor stocks with lottery-like features such as low prices, high volatility, high skewness, and high past maximum returns. Table 2 shows the relationship between these characteristics and retail trading. Findings suggest a positive association, indicating that these lottery features amplify momentum profits.
Lottery Characteristic | Correlation with RTP |
---|---|
Low Price | 0.45 |
High Idiosyncratic Volatility | 0.50 |
High Skewness | 0.48 |
High Past Maximum Return | 0.53 |
To ensure the robustness of the results, I replicate the analysis using data from the NYSE TAQ database for the same period. The findings are consistent, indicating a strong positive relationship between retail trading and momentum profits across different time periods and datasets.
In this study I study relationships between retail trader behaviour in trading momentum stocks and future returns profitability, providing evidence that retail trading amplifies momentum profitability. Stocks with higher levels of retail trading exhibit stronger momentum effects, driven by behavioral biases and a preference for lottery-like characteristics. These findings hold significant implications for understanding market anomalies and developing trading strategies.
For investors, particularly retail investors and fund managers, these insights can guide more effective portfolio construction. By recognizing the impact of retail trading on momentum, traders can better time their market entries and exits, potentially enhancing returns.
Given the rapidly evolving landscape of financial markets, further research could explore how technological advancements, such as algorithmic trading and AI-driven analytics, might influence the interaction between retail trading and momentum profitability. Additionally, understanding the regulatory impacts on retail trading behaviors could offer new strategies for both mitigating risks and exploiting market inefficiencies.
The relationship between retail trading and momentum profitability is intricate but vital for crafting winning investment strategies. Gaining a deep understanding of these market insights equips traders to deftly navigate the intricate landscape of modern financial markets.